Page 160 - صبا 04

From Praise Wisdom Sanai To Orbital Rebel Attar

(Stylistic comparison of Hadiqah's Praise and

Mantiq ut Taire

Hamid Akbarpour
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language & Literature, Open
University, Al-Mustafa International University of Qom, Qom, Iran

abstract

This article was written to achieve two goals: first, to study and examine the
intellectual and literary similarities and differences of two important
foundations of mystical literature (Hadeeqah and al-Tir logic) in order to more
accurately understand the views and thoughts of the two mystics. Second, to
discover the elements of their literary aesthetics in the way of processing
mystical thoughts in their Tahmidiyas. In the upcoming research, the two
intellectual and literary levels of the two Tahmidiyas will be examined based on
the view of the constructionists. Al-Sanaei's garden is a leading work in the
composition of Persian literature, followed by Al-Tayir's Logic. However, it is
different from the garden in some ways and has its own personal style. Two
questions are raised in this research: First, why do two converging thoughts face
intellectual differences? Second, can these differences that have arisen harm
their unity and unity of content? The results of this research show that Sana'i's
mystical behavior is more wise and cautious than Attar's, and the elements of
educational politeness are more dominant in his garden. On the other hand,
Attar's mystical attitude is more passionate and restless, and the elements of
romantic emotions are more visible in his poetry for this reason. In Hadiqah,
social wisdom is more discerning and in al-Tayir logic, love and individuality
are more pretentious. The existing differences do not harm the unity of their
belief due to the dominant thought of mystical monotheism.

Keywords: comparison, stylistics, Thamidiyyah, Hadiqah, al-Tair logi

1 Email: Hamid.akbarpour1397@gmail.com