Page 41 - Pure Life 26
P. 41
/
40 International Multi. J. of PURE LIFE. 8 (26): 31-74, Spring 2021
(
this thought formed on his ideas as the
from a turning point origin of relativism in
1
within Kant; but Kant knowledge. What a
did not remain confined divorced on his idealism
to this purely experimental transcendental idealism
thinking that makes the “Transcendental
soul a slave to external idealism” this relativism
experience and an arena has been noted by some
in which its horses run; who have read Kantian
but rather a space for thought as a summary
making general laws of its sensual knowledge,
and universal rules that (Cobblestone, 2010: 296)
Hume was unable to accept. which in turn distinguished
Kant arranged in his Kantian knowledge from
knowledge a set of others such as Cartesian
issues he called tribal or what we see from his
issues through which he criticism of Leibniz and
could transform experience Wolff. (Ibid: 268)
into a general rule,
which would make his 1. The difference between Kant
knowledge rational. and the idealists is that Kant
➢ Kant mediated, or in accepts the external existence as
a reality and the basis of mental
other words, his judgment, while idealism tends to
combination of the confine knowledge to ideas
authenticity of experience rather than things, (Ref: Kant,
on the one hand and 2017: 45; Badawi, 2008, Vol. 2: 439)
idealism on the other which Kant expresses it by
human
knowledge
launching
hand, making the light from experience.
