Page 95 - Pure Life 23
P. 95
(
/
94 International Multi. J. of PURE LIFE. 7 (23): 91-106, Summer 2020
The Dialogue as Humanitarian human rights, it was possible to
Principle notice that when your side has
With the contemporary developed a multiplication of
discussion about the relativity human rights, with tutelage
of Human Rights, which would increasingly specifies the
lose power to question about human being, although this
the legitimacy of a universal plurality in assistance not
paradigm about those rights, admire native demands, and the
since the culture, quality and compartmentalization of the
essentially human attribute is groups as homogeneous agents
distinct as many are the groups equipped with social interests
and its different temporalities and possibilities for enjoyment.
and spatialities analyzed. From then on, we can
Concepts and judgments contemplate the discussion on
enclosed under a Eurocentric screen, addressing the Islam as
perspective become a judicial body,
inappropriet, when you demographically significant
understand such problematic. able to erect territories from
Believing, as Max Weber, their cultural practices imposed
that man is an animal tied to (BONNEMAISON: 2005).
networks and dealings of So if I understand the
significance he himself has, it question raised about the
is considered culture as being paradox in which the human
this complex network of rights that, although human and
natural and historical plot, universal advocate for
however, she is not an minorities and segments
experimental science object inserted into broader categories
looking for laws, but an and generalized, we can treat
interpretative science, looking the Shi'a Islamic community
for meaning. (ithna ashariyah) presente ao
So, to critical analyze, the redor do globo.
process of universalization of
