Page 30 - Pure Life 24
P. 30
A Comparative Approach to the “Trinity”… A-S. Fatemi Hasanabadi and M. Islami / 29
consider the “Trinity” to be is his ignorance of the time of
real or the “Trinity” to be the resurrection (Matthew, 24: 37)
figurative and monotheism to and the fact that the father is
be real, the problem would be greater than the son, (John, 14: 28)
simple; but the strange thing is it is one of the teachings that
that they both know the truth. denies the “Trinity”.
It is in this case that they are The New Testament also
faced with an unreasonable states that believers are
problem; because the equation children of God; (Matthew, 5:
1=3 is not acceptable to 9; Luke, 20: 36) Such
anyone; this is why they interpretations are figurative;
believe that the “Trinity” But Christians consider them
should not be accepted by the to be true about Christ and
standard of reason; But should figurative about other believers.
be adhered to by the standard
of worship and the heart. 3. Opposing the Words
It seeks such issues that the of Christ
separation and alienation of In order to remove any
science and religion in ambiguity about his worship,
Christian logic is reasonable Christ has repeatedly emphasized
and acceptable. his servitude, which is mentioned
in the Holy Quran; Including
2. Opposing the Teachings the following two verses:
of the Gospels - “When Jesus came with
In some Gospels, there are Clear Signs, he said:
phrases from which the “Now have I come to
“Trinity” is derived; but by you with Wisdom”, and
referring to all the verses and in order to make clear
teachings of this holy book, to you some of the
one can understand the opposite. (points) on which ye
Accordingly, the testimony dispute: therefore fear
of Christ to his humility Allah and obey me. For
towards God (Matthew, 11: 27) Allah, He is my Lord
