Page 86 - Pure Life 29
P. 86

Functions of Custom Law in … H. Andalib / (85

               meaning,  and  when  they  are        reason”,  “acquisitions  based
               placed  together,  they  convey       on  the  relationship  between
               that matter.                          sentence and subject”, “customary
                  The  limitation  of  custom        priority”,  “change  of  text”.
               efficiency in the former usage        (Alidoust, 2010: 231-233)
               can     be     considered      as

               “imaginary  concepts”  and  its           3.  Referring to custom in
               limitation  in  the  discussed               conforming customary
               usage as “affirmative concepts”.             concepts to instances
                  In    previous     and     last    In  religious  texts,  we  see
               jurisprudential     and     legist    thousands  of  sentences  which
               writings,  there  is  a  lot  of      have subjects based on costume

               practical  and  scientific  aspect    and predicates on religion.
               of this usage; for example, the          There  are  some  examples
               late  Seyyed  Morteza  has            such as, usurpation is forbidden;
               dedicated  a  chapter  to  this       buying and selling are allowed;
               efficiency  in  his  book  of         the  deal  of  idiots  and  lunatics
               principles entitled “Chapter on       is  void;  blood  is  impure;
               the  allocation  of  the  public  to   intoxication  is  forbidden;  if  it

               habits”- although incomplete.         is  expedient,  the  guardian  can
                  This  efficiency  has  been        seize the assets of the pupil, etc.
               mentioned  by  the  later  ones          In  all  these  cases,  the
               with titles such as “refinement       predicates are religious, whether
               of  basis  of  the  ruling”,          it is a law that did not already
               “abolition     of   specificity”,     exist and was legislated by the

               “specification     of    reason”,     legislator,  or  already  existed
               “restriction of reason”, “failure     and approved by the legislator.
               to conclude the absoluteness of       The  terms  used  by  the
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91