Page 66 - Pure Life 30
P. 66

The Nature of Religious Language… M. Mousavi Karimi and H. Tehrani Haeri / (65

               we  should  reinterpret  it  in        discussion about such criticisms
               modern  terms  such  that  it          is out of the scope of this paper.
               could  be  understood  in  the            By having these theories in

               modern world.                          hand, let us now explain and
                  For  example,  a  scientific        interpret some paradigm examples
               modern view does not accept            of  “Masnavi’s”  poems,  and
               that  “Christ  is  Lord”  is  a        then,  regarding  the  theories,
               historical fact. However, as a         explain and categorize Rumi’s
               matter  of  faith,  one  can  take     views on religious language.

               this as a way of responding to
               God’s message through responding
               to the calls of Jesus.
                  In  sum,  although  the
               language     of    religion   is
               factually  non-cognitive  and
               mythical,  its  meaningfulness

               for the modern world can be
               saved  and  heard  through
               striping away its outdated and
               unacceptable worldview. The
               following diagram shows the
               abovementioned  theories  and

               their relations.
                  It is worth mentioning that
               all  these  theories  have  been
               criticized  severely;  however,
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71