Page 159 - Pure Life 33
P. 159
(
158 International Multi. J. of PURE LIFE. 10 (33): 131-167, Winter. 2023
Sheikh Saduq took benefit infallible Imams and their
of various arguments in companions whenever
multiple issues e.g. deduction and perspective
incorporeality, pre-eternity, meant as analogy (Qiyas),
wisdom, justice, etc. What metaphor (Tamthil) and
have been criticized by the juristic preference, as
Imamiyah narrators and applied by non-Imamiyah
theologians in early eras people of hadith, jurists and
are Qiyas (analogy) in theologians like Abu
principle of jurisprudence Hanifah in jurisprudence.
and intellectual preference Therefore, thinking,
(Istihsan) as well as perspective and deduction
thinking about the essence as authentically stated in
of Allah, in which various the Quran have never been
hadiths rejecting it found in negotiated by the
the books of the narrators. companions of the infallible
It has been negated and Imams and the Imamiyah
rejected by the scholars of transmitters of hadith.
Imamiyah, both narrators Providing entire conditions
and theologians, whenever of contemplation and
thinking, contemplation research i.e. accompanying
and thought meant as of intellect and revelation,
thinking about Allah’s Sheikh Saduq considered
essence, anthropomorphism them definitive and
and corporeality. rational, like the mentioned
Likewise, it has been arguments as examples in
criticized by the both the previous sections.
