Page 123 - Pure Life 35
P. 123
(
122 / International Multi. J. of PURE LIFE. 10(35), Summer. 2023
has proved the incorporeality cannot be material; Of course,
of the soul by showing the Bergson does not achieve his
incorporeality of consciousness goal easily and explains in
and perception. (Tabatabai, this field to a great extent.
1997, Vol. 6: 192) (Pirmoradi, 2014: 48)
According to Bergson, man According to him, matter
is composed of two parts; one cannot be confined to the
is the body and the other is form we have of it; just as it
the soul. (Gunn, 2004: 297) cannot be considered a truth
In order to quash the other than what is understood;
viewpoint of materialists who, rather, matter is a collection
using the findings of of representations, according
psychology, considered the to Bergson. The meaning of
brain to be the place of representation is a kind of
conceptions and memories of existence between the object
the past, he sought help from and the image; i.e., it is more
the science of psychology than the image and less than
itself and came to the the object. (Bergson et al,
conclusion that the memories 2004, Chapter 4: 12)
have no place in the brain and In terms of existence, the
basically they have no place. soul is considered the
In this way, he comes close to perfection of matter and, at
announcing the incorporeality the same time, both of them
of the soul and the negation of originate from a single
materialism. substance called duration and,
It is natural that the force in this sense, he can be
that kept these memories considered a monist; But in
