Page 173 - Pure Life 33

(

172 International Multi. J. of PURE LIFE. 10 (33): 169-217, Winter. 2023
sharply from each other: cosmologists, however,
some believe in God as the who believe that all

creator and the sustainer of phenomena can be
the universe, and some explained scientifically, have
consider the existence of found scenario (2) the most

the universe as a brute fact desirable option for scientists.
needing no explanation. Gribbin (1986: 392), for
The importance of instance, claims that the

scenarios (3) and (4), suggested models of
however, is that they have creation in modern physics
been theorized in reaction leave no place for the

to the implications of traditional metaphysical
modern cosmology. attitude to creation since
In this paper, I do not such models well explain

intend to examine scenarios how the universe can create
(1), (3), and (4). Rather I itself from nothingness at
aim to discuss and criticize time zero (t=0).
scenario (2). He concludes that

Contrary to philosophers, philosophers theorize beyond

for whom the problem of their domain. Gribbin’s
the origin of the world has claim reflects the idea of

always been a matter of some cosmologists who
discussion, most scientists, believe that internal
as Hoyle (1975: 166) says, elements of the universe

consider this problem are sufficient to explain,
“outside the range of both epistemologically and
scientific discussion”. Some ontologically, the creation