Page 136 - Pure Life 37
P. 136
A Critique on the Philosophical Foundations… T. Dehghanpour & M.M. Gorjian (135
endeavored to take a step will, or does the habitual
between methodological simply smooth the ground for
individualism and methodological performing certain actions,
collectivism in the third path, without changing the individual’s
and based on that, he should free will in changing habit.
pay attention to both Bourdieu believed that if a
individual characteristics and sociologist has a scholastic
the role of society. However, approach detached from reality,
it seems that based on a he will suffer from some kind
philosophical principle, as of prejudice and the results he
well as the perspective of obtains will be far from the
Tabataba'i, the existence of existing realities. The mentioned
contradictions and inconsistencies word deserves serious critique
in a viewpoint is clear since the word firstly itself
evidence of the existence of comes from a certain
basic objection. intellectual and knowledge
His method is eclectic of base; whether we consider the
Durkheim and Weber rather name of that intellectual base
than a coherent and innovative as a school or this action as
method. This eclecticism lacks scholastic or not. On the
the necessary coherence and other hand, a person never
synergy, and therefore sometimes thinks in a vacuum, rather
challenges Bourdieu’s thoughts. every thought has a prior
For example, it is not clear intellectual base and context.
what the concept of habitual Secondly, the researcher must
has to do with the freedom of free himself as much as
the doer. Is the influence of possible from the prejudices
the habitual to the extent that based on previous beliefs to
it forces a person to perform draw a necessary conclusion.
certain actions in such a way Thirdly, if the school of
that it deprives him of free thought that the researcher
