Page 134 - Pure Life 37
P. 134
A Critique on the Philosophical Foundations… T. Dehghanpour & M.M. Gorjian (133
Furthermore, since dialectical while there is another option
materialists consider themselves or a third way for it.
realists and others who For example, man emphasizes
believe in metaphysics as the opposition of mental
idealists, they consider divine structure/position in the social
affairs and metaphysical world and believes that
beliefs apart from reality, changing the position in the
whereas this claim itself is a social world leads to a change
kind of begging the question in the mental structure, and also
or assuming the conclusion. based on this philosophical
The world’s monopoly on attitude, including Tabataba'i’s
matter and materials requires perspectives, there is no
proof unless it will be a claim contradiction between the
without reason. Despite Tabataba'i mental structure and position
works, the monopoly of the in the social world and
world on matter is negated, between the two concepts of
we believe in metaphysics in mental structure and position
the realm of existence and in the social world, one is not
revelation, intuition, and reason the complete cause of the
in the realm of epistemology. other.
Boudreau, like many social The question is whether it
and cultural thinkers, has is impossible to change the
been captured by the dualism attitude and mental structure
of rotten rope (Complex of people to lead to changing
question fallacy). That is, the social position. If yes, in
creating an unrealistic contrast this case, Bourdieu has
between two things, which is committed himself to a form
not a real contrast between of social determinism despite
the two so that the audience is his desire to emphasize
limited to choose one of them, human freedom. If not, then
he should acknowledge this
