Page 124 - Pure Life 37
P. 124
A Critique on the Philosophical Foundations… T. Dehghanpour & M.M. Gorjian (123
issues such as power, science, person benefits from in
education, sports, art, and interaction with others.
especially social action According to Bourdieu, habit
concerning the objective and is after the symbolic
subjective dimensions of dimension of social life and
social life, i.e., the fields and can be called narratives
habits at macro, medium and embodied in bodies. Bourdieu
micro levels have analyzed. calls the value priority taste
From Bourdieu’s viewpoint, and uses lifestyle instead of
the social space community is the consumption model. Social
composed of an interconnected function or praxis is also a
set of fields and people who flow that takes place and
are located in the fabric of actualizes through action.
these fields and interact and (Grenfell, 2014)
compete with each other Bourdieu does not mention
individually and socially to the philosophical infrastructures
obtain the capital available in and the foundations of
the fields, while they can metaphysical ontology. Although
change or reproduce this it can be concluded that his
space through this interaction intellectual system is based on
that. The social field is the materialism, some researchers
place where social actors considered him a thinker in
interact, and the social the field of dialectical
structure is history embodied materialism.
in objects.
Bourdieu considers social • Epistemological Assumptions
class to include people who Bourdieu considers sociology
are in a similar position in a theoretical and practical
terms of capital, taste, and knowledge that has both proof
lifestyle. From his viewpoint, and interpretation aspects. He
capital is a capability that a considers the task of
sociology to plan and analyze
