Page 130 - Pure Life 37
P. 130
A Critique on the Philosophical Foundations… T. Dehghanpour & M.M. Gorjian (129
• Theory Of Contingents intelligible sciences and other
Due to the expansion of contingents. (Ibid, 1994: 151-152)
social relations and the The Tabataba'i believes
necessity of social laws, that social contingent sciences
contingent sciences were are Fact (Nafs al-Amr) i.e.,
proposed in front of real they do not have any base and
sciences that have their self. do not indicate reality.
Explaining contingents in a Additionally, limits and proofs
separate chapter and introducing cannot be established for
its instances including humanities them, and the container for
and social sciences in the their realization is contingent,
contemporary era, Tabataba'i which is achieved by practical
caused more serious attention intellect with reflection; (Ibid,
to be paid to this part of 1995: 122-124) Of course, he
contingent sciences, which can considers some of the beliefs,
be seen in a sense in the created by the mind, as divine
works of old philosophers, and religious practical
including Avicenna. (Ref: instructions, having a base
Avicenna, 1984: 7) within themselves. (Ibid, 1999: 101)
Tabataba'i believes that a According to Tabataba'i,
group of contingents are the only valid and authentic
concepts that human creates practical and valid rulings are
to meet their interests and those that were formed after
needs in their daily and knowing the truth and the real
material lives. (Tabataba'i, happiness of mankind and
2009a: 127) based on the power of realistic
He divides acquired reason. (Ibid, 2009b: 195)
sciences into true and valid Valid cases, whose predicates
ones in the general sense i.e., are valid, are unreal i.e., their
philosophical and logical predicates do not correspond
externally, except according
